Maximum Fan Speed

Our maximum speed testing is performed with both the fans and the pump of the kit powered via a 12V DC source. This input voltage should have the pump and fans matching the speed ratings of the manufacturer. Arctic Cooling rates the 120 mm fans of the Liquid Freezer II 240 at 1800 RPM and the 140 mm fans of the Liquid Freezer II 420 at 1700 RPM. According to our tachometer, the fans were rotating at 1820 RPM and 1610 RPM respectively, with the 120 mm fans landing very close to their specification but the 140 mm fans were considerably slower than expected, yet still within a reasonable ±10% tolerance.

Average Thermal Resistance

Core Temperature, Constant Thermal Load (Max Fan Speed)

At first glance, the average thermal performance charts reveal that the Liquid Freezer II 420 is significantly outperforming any AIO cooler that we have tested to this date. With an average thermal resistance of 0.0576 °C/W, the Liquid Freezer II 420 is exceeded only by a high-end, open loop cooling kit (the Alphacool), and even then it's rather close. One must not forget that the radiator of the Liquid Freezer II 420 also is the largest that we have ever tested, with the design relying on the massive thermal exchange area for its exceptional thermal performance. Still, the flow of the minipump inside the block assembly holds the Liquid Freezer II 420 back, with the advantage of Alphacool’s much more powerful pump being greatly apparent at low loads.

The sound pressure level of the cooler is at 43.8 dB(A), which is on the high side for comfortable use, but to be expected from a cooler using three high speed 140 mm fans.

Fan Speed (12 Volts)

Noise level

The 240 version of the cooler also performs very well, providing strong competition to equally-sized coolers. The average thermal resistance of the Liquid Freezer II 240 at full fan speeds is 0.0745 °C/W, placing it a tiny bit ahead of most of its direct competitors in terms of thermal performance. However, the sound pressure level of 42 dB(A) is higher than the figures we got from competitive products, with the 40 mm fan on the block mostly responsible for the increased noise output.

Low Fan Speed

Using a PWM voltage regulator, we reduced the speed of the fans manually down to half their rated speed, which is 900 RPM. The pump was also connected to the same power source, functioning properly at this low-speed setting.

Average Thermal Resistance

Core Temperature, Constant Thermal Load (Low Fan Speed)

The Liquid Freezer II 240 seems to be doing great in this test, with an average thermal resistance of 0.0896 °C/W, surpassing nearly all equally sized AIO coolers. The catch is that it also is significantly louder than its direct competition as well. The emitting sound pressure of 36.7 dB(A) is not high enough to be considered loud, yet the difference over competitive products is significant and discernible.

Fan Speed (7 Volts)

Noise level

The massive proportions of the Liquid Freezer II 420 give the cooler a great performance advantage even when its fans and pump are at half speed. With an average thermal resistance is 0.0783 °C/W, the Liquid Freezer II 420 thermally outperforms everything that we have ever tested to this date. The sound pressure of 37.9 dB(A) is on the high side though, as expected from three 140 mm fans plus a small 40 mm fan on the main block.

Thermal Resistance VS Sound Pressure Level

During our thermal resistance vs. sound pressure level test, we maintain a steady 100W thermal load and assess the overall performance of the coolers by taking multiple temperature and sound pressure level readings within the operating range of the stock cooling fans. The result is a graph that depicts the absolute thermal resistance of the cooler in comparison to the noise generated. For both the sound pressure level and absolute thermal resistance readings, lower figures are better.

In this graph, we can discern how Arctic Cooling’s liquid coolers rank against the competition at a reasonable power level. We see that the Liquid Freezer II 240 can reach thermal resistance values slightly lower than competitive coolers but can be a bit louder than other designs. Much of that noise is coming from the additional 40 mm fan on the block but the significant backpressure of the thick radiator also is a bit to blame. The thermal performance of the Liquid Freezer II 420 is better than most of the competition but its performance edge is not that great under these operating conditions, as the massive cooler practically requires an equally massive load to reach its optimal operating conditions.

Testing Methodology Final Words & Conclusion
POST A COMMENT

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • BattleRam - Friday, January 15, 2021 - link

    Is this compatible with TRx40 AMD cpu's? Reply
  • evilspoons - Friday, January 15, 2021 - link

    On the first page:

    "It is large enough for most commercial processors but will not cover a ThreadRipper processor, for which the Freezer II coolers have no stock support for out of the box."
    Reply
  • WarWolverine - Friday, January 15, 2021 - link

    I was looking for 360mm because it was $120 for amazon a week or 2 ago but now they are sold out. But yesterday 420mm was available off amazon for $160 so I grabbed that. Hopefully it'll fit into my Phanteks Pro. Replacing Deepcool Captain 360 from 2017. Kinda an overkill for a 5600x. With Deepcool I'm getting 73C and lots of throttling 5600x @ 4.85Ghz (kryonaut thermal paste). Reply
  • Holliday75 - Friday, January 15, 2021 - link

    Yeah the 360's are hard to find. I got lucky and picked one off of Amazon at MSRP a few weeks back. Reply
  • schujj07 - Friday, January 15, 2021 - link

    In reality all of the Liquid Freezer IIs are hard to find. When you do find them, typically they are selling for over MSRP. Reply
  • nils_ - Saturday, January 16, 2021 - link

    I couldn't find the 420 version in Germany, the 360 was available however. Might just upgrade later. Reply
  • Makaveli - Saturday, January 16, 2021 - link

    lol kinda overkill a 420mm on a 6 core 5600x 65watt tdp chip indeed. Reply
  • WarWolverine - Sunday, January 17, 2021 - link

    Update: the 420 cooler came in. It took me over an hour to put in. It almost didn't fit. CPU power was in the way, I had to force it a few millimeters out of the way. I ran 3D mark time spy like I did with 360 Captain and I got 70C vs 73C. Mobo fan curve is set to Performance. It does improve cooling and it takes longer to heat up but it does heat up. I did a stress test with cpu z for a few minutes and it did heat up to 72C. I am OCing 5600x to 4850 with PBO 2. Undervolt curve on 4 cores at - 15 and 2 best cores at - 5. I'm kind of disappointed that the best cooler I can get only delays the heat and not keep the the CPU under 70C. Maybe if I manually OC it will have lower temps. Maybe I didn't put enough kryonut thermal paste. I'll try to re-do it later. I will try to replace the fans with NH U12A 3000rpm fans later. Reply
  • TheWereCat - Sunday, January 17, 2021 - link

    I was able to get the 360mm for €90. I replaced the NH-U12A which was the same price. Now I get about 20°C less at also lower noise... 3900X CPU. Reply
  • Showtime - Friday, January 15, 2021 - link

    Surprising that it has become a thickness race already. You still get to claim top performance at x dimensions with a caveat (that it won't fit lol). Thinner fans could help, but that will cost more, and be louder. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now