CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We put the memory settings at the CPU manufacturers suggested frequency, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

For X570 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1903 update as per our Ryzen 3000 CPU review.

Rendering - Blender 2.7b: 3D Creation Suite - link

A high profile rendering tool, Blender is open-source allowing for massive amounts of configurability, and is used by a number of high-profile animation studios worldwide. The organization recently released a Blender benchmark package, a couple of weeks after we had narrowed our Blender test for our new suite, however their test can take over an hour. For our results, we run one of the sub-tests in that suite through the command line - a standard ‘bmw27’ scene in CPU only mode, and measure the time to complete the render.

Rendering: Blender 2.79b

Streaming and Archival Video Transcoding - Handbrake 1.1.0

A popular open source tool, Handbrake is the anything-to-anything video conversion software that a number of people use as a reference point. The danger is always on version numbers and optimization, for example the latest versions of the software can take advantage of AVX-512 and OpenCL to accelerate certain types of transcoding and algorithms. The version we use here is a pure CPU play, with common transcoding variations.

We have split Handbrake up into several tests, using a Logitech C920 1080p60 native webcam recording (essentially a streamer recording), and convert them into two types of streaming formats and one for archival. The output settings used are:

  • 720p60 at 6000 kbps constant bit rate, fast setting, high profile
  • 1080p60 at 3500 kbps constant bit rate, faster setting, main profile
  • 1080p60 HEVC at 3500 kbps variable bit rate, fast setting, main profile

Handbrake 1.1.0 - 720p60 x264 6000 kbps FastHandbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 x264 3500 kbps FasterHandbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 HEVC 3500 kbps Fast

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7.1: Ray Tracing - link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7.1 Benchmark

Compression – WinRAR 5.60b3: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.60b3

Synthetic – 7-Zip v1805: link

Out of our compression/decompression tool tests, 7-zip is the most requested and comes with a built-in benchmark. For our test suite, we’ve pulled the latest version of the software and we run the benchmark from the command line, reporting the compression, decompression, and a combined score.

It is noted in this benchmark that the latest multi-die processors have very bi-modal performance between compression and decompression, performing well in one and badly in the other. There are also discussions around how the Windows Scheduler is implementing every thread. As we get more results, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Encoding: 7-Zip 1805 CompressionEncoding: 7-Zip 1805 DecompressionEncoding: 7-Zip 1805 Combined

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady-state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

84 Comments

View All Comments

  • goatfajitas - Friday, December 20, 2019 - link

    We are talking about an open system build with a see-through window. People have been modding and making it look pretty for a couple decades now... Lights, colored water in see-through tubes, UV reflective material, RAM heatsinks in all sorts of colors, etc. It's not a new thing, and alot of people do it. I did but stopped about 10 years ago in favor of smaller silent builds, but alot still do. I get why the OP doesnt, I dont either but this board isnt for us.
  • bji - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    You are saying that the vast majority of people buy laptop computer PARTS based on fashion?

    I doubt it. I think you actually just didn't read closely the thread you are responding to.
  • rahvin - Friday, December 20, 2019 - link

    Apple wouldn't exist if the looks didn't matter to people.
  • Foeketijn - Friday, December 20, 2019 - link

    Not at all. Just a very small selection of DIY builders read reviews to look for the best of the best parts.
    Most of them just buy brand X, because that's the best in the world, since they bought that last time. Any small systembuilder mainly looks at the probability of a part dying under warranty and margin. The time where you wanted to know if the system had a SiS/nForce chipset or rambus memory are long gone.
  • Strunf - Friday, December 20, 2019 - link

    I'm pretty sure the vast majority of the DIY read reviews, the FACT Ryzen is selling so well on the DIY market is the proof of it.
  • Eliadbu - Wednesday, January 1, 2020 - link

    If looks would not have a part in hardware sells than RGB and other elaborate aesthetic designs should have been non-existent. We all know what is the current situation for all hardware parts...
  • sor - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    I value the fact that it is one of the very few fanless systems I’ve seen for the new AMD chipsets.

    I’m sure someone could cobble together a water block for the chipset and/or buy water blocks, but having it all in a coherent package also has value.

    You seem to only value overclocksbility when it comes to fancy cooling solutions. I tend to go water cooling for everything, even at stock frequencies, just for the silence.

    I’d peg this product better aimed at threadripper though for the price bracket.
  • sor - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    “A tenth the price” is hyperbole. A comparable water cooling system would run $600... I’d be nice and say $500. Look at Corsair or EKWB CPU cooling systems that include CPU water block, pump, radiator, tubing, and a reservoir. Then add a chipset water block (that I’m not sure are even available for an x570). Then add the cost of the motherboard - the Asrock Phantom gaming X is $400.

    All said, if we were conservative, yes this might only be $700-800 of gear for $1000.
  • TheSkullCaveIsADarkPlace - Friday, December 27, 2019 - link

    From your comparison here i take it that the price of this board includes pump, radiator, tubing and reservoir. Awesome!!! ;-P
  • hbsource - Friday, December 20, 2019 - link

    I feel you're still missing the point and don't understand handbags.

    The vast, vast majority of all bags sold in the world are sold on performance. Same for motherboards. A small majority of bags sell for an awful lot of money.

    Chanel bags do not sell for £5000 because they 'work properly for awhile.'

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now