Samsung SSD 840 EVO mSATA (120GB, 250GB, 500GB & 1TB) Review
by Kristian Vättö on January 9, 2014 1:35 PM ESTPerformance vs. Transfer Size
ATTO is a useful tool for quickly benchmarking performance across various transfer sizes. You can get the complete data set in Bench. The EVO mSATA is top of the class at all transfer sizes. Even though we're dealing with highly compressible data, which is the strength of SandForce, the EVO mSATA turns out to be slightly faster than the Intel SSD 525. Keep in mind that these tests are with an empty drive so TurboWrite plays a massive role and since the test only writes 2GB, all EVO mSATAs perform similarly regardless of the capacity.
Click for full size
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
65 Comments
View All Comments
wingless - Thursday, January 9, 2014 - link
1TB in that small package?! 2014 is really the FUTURE! This will turn my laptop into a monster.Samus - Thursday, January 9, 2014 - link
What's interesting is it isn't even worth considering these models UNLESS you go with 1TB, because all the other capacities aren't nearly price competitive with the competition. Fortunately for Samsung, there is no competition at the flagship capacity, so they could charge whatever they want.Kristian Vättö - Friday, January 10, 2014 - link
Like I said, those are MSRPs, not street prices. The MSRPs of the 2.5" EVO are only $10 less but as you can see, the street prices are significantly lower.TheSlamma - Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - link
it's the presentjaydee - Thursday, January 9, 2014 - link
Hard for me to justify the 48-55% price premium of the 840 EVO over the Crucial M500 (250 GB and 500 GB versions). At some point "faster" SSD's hits diminishing returns in "real life" scenario's...fokka - Thursday, January 9, 2014 - link
"I wasn't able to find the EVO mSATA on sale anywhere yet, hence the prices in the table are the MSRPs provided by Samsung. For the record, the MSRPs for EVO mSATA are only $10 higher than 2.5" EVO's, so I fully expect the prices to end up being close to what the 2.5" EVO currently retails for."meaning: the prices will go down, once broadly available.
emn13 - Thursday, January 9, 2014 - link
On the desktop? Given the lack of power-loss protection, the 840 EVO is probably a worse choice even at comparable prices.But on mobile? Sudden power loss is less likely (though background GC complicates that picture), and the 840 EVO's lower power draw, particularly in idle, extends battery life.
I'm pretty sure I'd opt for the 840 EVO on a battery-powered device, assuming the price difference isn't too great.
nathanddrews - Thursday, January 9, 2014 - link
If it helps your decision at all, I just upgraded my wife's notebook (Lenovo Y580) from a 2.5" 250GB Samsung 840 (not pro) to an mSATA 240GB Crucial M500 (and then put the stock 750GB HDD back in) and it's phenomenal. The M500 feels snappier, but that could just be due to restoring the existing Windows image onto a clean drive. Either way, it was a great $130 upgrade.If you have a free mSATA port on your notebook, it's a no-brainer to get an SSD for it.
Solid State Brain - Thursday, January 9, 2014 - link
The trim behavior might be something introduced with one of the latest firmwares. I have a Samsung 840 250GB and I recently tried doing some steady state tests. After hammering it with writes, trim does not restore performance immediately. However with normal usage/light workloads, or keeping the drive idle, however, it will eventually (in a matter of hours) return back to the initial performance.I guess this is some kind of strategy to improve long term wear/stability/write endurance. Maybe some sustained write protection kicks in to avoid writing immediately at full speed after trimming the free space.
Solid State Brain - Thursday, January 9, 2014 - link
PS: where's the edit button to fix typos/errors, etc, when needed?? :(