Meet the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT

Shifting gears, let’s talk about the actual hardware that will be hitting retail shelves today. As I mentioned towards the start of the article, AMD isn’t launching an official reference RX 5600 XT, so today’s launch is all about partner cards. To that end, AMD has sampled us with Sapphire’s Pulse RX 5600 XT. Sapphire’s card is a moderately factory overclocked card, and following AMD’s BIOS changes, is apparently a good example of what AMD wants other partner factory overclocked cards to be like.

Radeon RX 5600 XT Card Comparison
  Radeon RX 5600 XT
(Reference Specification)
Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT
(Quiet Mode)
Sapphire Pulse RX 5500 XT
(Default/Perf Mode)
Base Clock 1290MHz? 1290MHz 1290MHz
Game Clock 1375MHz 1460MHz 1615MHz
Boost Clock 1560MHz 1620MHz 1750MHz
Memory Clock 12Gbps GDDR6 12Gbps GDDR6 14Gbps GDDR6
VRAM 6GB 6GB 6GB
TBP 150W ~150W ~180W
GPU Power Limit (TGP) N/A 135W 160W
Length N/A 10-inches
Width N/A 2.3-Slot
Cooler Type N/A Open Air, Dual Fan
Price $279 $289

Editor's Note: These are the specs post-BIOS update. Anyone buying the Pulse in January will want to make sure to update their card with Sapphire’s new BIOSes

Sapphire has several sub-brands of cards, including the Nitro and the Pulse. Normally the Nitro cards are their higher-priced factory overclocked cards, while the Pulse cards are more straightforward. But following AMD’s BIOS changes, that seems to have at least partially gone out the window. In any case, even with its factory overclock the Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT is not being positioned as a high-end card among RX 5600 XTs; at $289, it carries just a $10 premium over AMD’s MSRP.

For their Pulse RX 5600 XT cards, Sapphire has opted to factory overclock both modes for the card. The card’s default mode, which is its performance mode, ships with a ~180W TBP. This affords a rather sizable 240MHz (17%) increase in the card’s rated game clock. Meanwhile the memory clock has been increased by 2Gbps (17%) to 14Gbps. In short, in performance mode the Pulse is noticeably more powerful (and power-hungry) than a baseline RX 5600 XT.

On the flip side of the coin is the card’s quiet mode BIOS. This BIOS uses settings much closer to AMD’s own reference specs, with the 150W TBP and 12Gbps matching AMD’s. The only change here is that the card gets a milder 85MHz (6%) factory overclock, as far as the game clock is concerned.

Digging into the card, it’s clear from the start that Sapphire has overbuilt the card, particularly for cooling performance. At 10-inches long the card isn’t especially lengthy, but Sapphire makes up for that with a 2.3-slot wide cooler design and significantly taller (5.3-inch) frame. Comparing it to NVIDIA’s relatively compact dual-fan GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edition, the Sapphire Pulse RX 5660 XT has about 50% more volume. Which, along with making the card a bit of a pain to install, affords it a lot more volume for heatsinks and fans.

The payoff for this oversized design is that Sapphire can use larger, lower RPM fans to minimize the fan noise. The Pulse 5600 XT packs 2 95mm fans, which in our testing never got past 1150 RPM. And even then, the card supports zero fan speed idle, so the fans aren’t even on until the card is running a real workload and starts warming up. The net result is that the already very quiet card is completely silent when it’s idling.

Meanwhile beneath the fans is a similarly oversized heatsink, which runs basically the entire length and most of the height of the board. A trio of heatpipes runs from the core to various points on the heatsink, helping to draw heat away from the GPU and thermal pad-attached GDDR6 memory. The fins are arranged horizontally, so the card tends to push air out via its I/O bracket as well as towards the front of a system. The card also comes with a metal backplate – no doubt needed to hold the oversized cooler together – with some venting that allows air to flow through the heatsink and out the back of the card.

Feeding the beast is an 8-pin external PCIe power cable, as well as PCIe slot power for its electricity needs. From a practical perspective this is well-provisioned for a card that will hit 180W, and with the design presumably being recycled from a 5700 series design, there’s room for a second power connector if Sapphire ever needed it.

Finally for hardware features, for display I/O we’re looking at a pretty typical quad port setup. Sapphire has equipped the card with 3x DisplayPort 1.4 outputs, as well as an HDMI 2.0b output. With daisy chaining or MST splitters, it’s possible to drive up to 6 monitors from the card.

Of Last-Minute BIOS Updates & Factory Overclocking The Test
Comments Locked

202 Comments

View All Comments

  • Korguz - Tuesday, January 21, 2020 - link

    maybe because there is no official ko edition ?? maybe its just something evga released for product naming only ?? 2060S maybe cause there was no point to enclude it in the charts ? you could always use ATs bench comparison...
  • philosofool - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link

    Probably because it’s a totally different price tier. They also didn’t include AMD offerings in that tier.
  • BG19902 - Tuesday, January 21, 2020 - link

    There's an error in the conclusion:

    "memory overclock in particular giving RX 5660 XT a several percent boost in performance". I believe that should be "5600 XT"
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, January 21, 2020 - link

    Right you are. Thanks!
  • Hrel - Tuesday, January 21, 2020 - link

    I think its interesting how little performance is actually gained beyond the 1650 Super. This is only 10% faster... Roughly. Going from 150 bucks, to 300 gets you 10-20% better fps? What a ripoff!

    This article makes an argument for the 1660 Super Better Than Anything Else, but even that's an extra $70 for what amounts to an extra 5-10fps? So, never gonna be the difference between playable and unplayable for 70 bucks!?

    Idk what's going on with GPUs, going higher end has always been a bad value but now its just dumb.

    It really is like everything has been reduced to xbone graphics so as long as your next card exceed ps5 performance you're good for 10+ years!
  • Retycint - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link

    1650 super is roughly equivalent to the 580, so the 5600XT is a lot more than "5-10% faster"
  • Samus - Tuesday, January 21, 2020 - link

    So the 2060 is basically irrelevant now. It was always too slow for ray tracing, and now it's outclassed for a cheaper, faster card.
  • Kurosaki - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link

    The 5950xt could not come sooner. We don't need another 590-league card
  • TheWereCat - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link

    Maybe I've read different review than you did but how is 5600XT a 590 performer?
  • misterragequit - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link

    Any way we could get some rendering comparisons in the Compute sections of these GPU reviews? Considering that GPU renderers with the OptiX backend are taking full use of the RT cores in Nvidia GPUs, I'd be interested to see how these Navi cards hold up. A simple comparison in Blender using the Cycles renderer would be great.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now