Power Consumption and Thermal Performance

The power consumption at the wall was measured with a 1080p display being driven through the HDMI port. In the graphs below, we compare the idle and load power of the ASRock Beebox-S 6200U with other low power PCs evaluated before. For load power consumption, we ran the AIDA64 System Stability Test with various stress components, and noted the maximum sustained power consumption at the wall.

Idle Power Consumption

Load Power Consumption (AIDA64 SST)

ASRock's configuration of the Beebox-S platform for better performance has the unfortunate side-effect of driving up the idle power consumption. The load power consumption is higher than the NUC6i5SYK despite operating at default TDPs likely because the Beebox-S has configured the OPI for higher performance, while the NUC65SYK numbers presented in this review are all with the original power-saving configuration.

Our thermal stress routine starts with the system at idle, followed by four stages of different system loading profiles using the AIDA64 System Stability Test (each of 30 minutes duration). In the first stage, we stress the CPU, caches and RAM. In the second stage, we add the GPU to the above list. In the third stage, we stress the GPU standalone. In the final stage, we stress all the system components (including the disks). Beyond this, we leave the unit idle in order to determine how quickly the various temperatures in the system can come back to normal idling range. The various clocks, temperatures and power consumption numbers for the system during the above routine are presented in the graphs below.

According to the official specifications, the junction temperature of the Core i5-6200U is 100C. The thermal solution employed in the Beebox-S 6200U is quite effective in keeping the CPU core / package temperature well below that even under maximum stress. The only disappointing aspect is the SSD temperature which goes close to 70C under stress. Due to the absence of any sort of thermal solution for the M.2 SSD, the drive also takes a very long time to get back to idling temperature In fact, even after 7 hours of removing the stress routine on the disk, the SSD temperature was more than 60C.

The power consumption characteristics provide more information about the TDP configuration. We see that the maximum CPU package power consumption is around 20W. This should be compared against the 23W and 28W numbers for the NUC6i5SYK and similar Haswell-based GIGABYTE BRIX units respectively.

The Beebox-S 6200U is actively cooled, and the chassis is not made of metal. Subjecting it to stress doesn't lead to unsafe internal temperatures. Therefore, the external chassis temperatures / hot spots are not much of a concern.

HTPC Credentials Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • dsraa - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    You're right, the link for newegg is a barebones unit for $319. Doesnt include anything.
  • Ro_Ja - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    Heh...We're talking about the NUC with the Skylake :)
  • Ro_Ja - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    The NUC's also good enough for gaming if you're not the type of maxing everything out at 1080P.
  • vailr - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    I think they stole the name from Jean-Louis Gassée:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BeBox
  • hojnikb - Thursday, August 11, 2016 - link

    > you would also be getting Intel QC.

    You means that "famous" intel QC, where they had to release numerous bios updates before the thing became useful ?
  • Samus - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    My only complaint is they cut costs using the Intel 3160 instead of the Intel 8260 (or even the older Intel 7260) which is ridiculous when you consider the 3160 and last-gen 7260 are virtually the same price.

    But at least they didn't use a 802.11n card. I can't believe how many of those I still see even in $1000 Thinkpad's and Elitebook's. Literally talking a few dollars in difference for improved range, performance and battery life going from 1x1 to 2x2.
  • u.of.ipod - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    I would love to see a review of the newest generation (and revision) of the Gigabyte Brix. The newest revisions have USB 3.1 (type c) ports and DDR4 RAM in addition to the Skylake CPUs
  • ganeshts - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    I have it in the queue, but I am waiting for a BIOS update : http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx... : Intel has made a bunch of fixes in the Skylake-U platform that are BIOS-related, and I want to evaluate with the most stable / recent platform Until GIGABYTE updates their BIOS with the fixes from Intel, I am not going to recommend the Skylake BRIX units.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    Still fixing it this long after Skylakes launch eh. What a mess. Kind of puts into perspective why there's no Macbook Pros with Skylake yet.
  • u.of.ipod - Saturday, August 13, 2016 - link

    Oh I didn't know there were problems with the Skylake BRIX units, I'll have to go re-read the Anandtech review.

    I just put together a simple Skylake BRIX i3 (the DDR3L version) for a friend using all open box parts from amazon. Seems to be humming right along for HTPC and emulator duties. I was considering upgrading my existing HTPC with one of the DDR4/USB C versions.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now