Introduction and Setup Impressions

ASRock has been one of the few motherboard vendors to focus on mini-PCs targeting the HTPC and portable gaming markets. Starting from the ION-based nettop days, they have consistently refreshed the mini-PC lineup in sync with Intel's product cycle. We reviewed the Haswell-based VisionX 420D last September. Instead of waiting for Broadwell / Skylake, ASRock has taken the opportunity of falling flash memory prices to bring out a mid-generation update in the form of the VisionX 471D.

In terms of external appearance, the VisionX 471D and the VisionX 420D are one and the same. However, there are two major updates under the hood. The Core i5-4200M is replaced by a Core i7-4712MQ, and the empty mSATA slot in the VisionX 420D now comes occupied by an ASint mSATA SSD. These two updates address some of the improvement aspects that we noted in our VisionX 420D review. In the rest of this review, we will see how the new VisionX 471D fares in our mini-PC evaluation routine. In particular, we will see if there are tangible improvements in real-life workloads, while also identify any caveats that arise due to the additional capabilities.

The specifications of the ASRock VisionX 471D are summarized in the table below.. The specifications of our review unit are summarized in the table below.

ASRock VisionX 471D Specifications
Processor Intel Haswell Core i7-4712MQ
(4C/8T x 2.30 GHz (3.30 GHz Turbo), 22nm, 6MB L2, 37W)
Memory 2 x 4GB ASint SSA304G08-EGN1B DDR3-1600
Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M270X (1 GB GDDR5 VRAM)
775 MHz (core) / 1125 MHz (memory)
Disk Drive(s) 256 GB ASint mSATA SSDMSK256G-M1
2 TB Seagate Samsung Spinpoint M9T ST2000LM003
Optical Drive(s) Lite-On Internal Slim DVD+/-RW Drive (DL-8A4SH-01)
Networking 1 x Gigabit Ethernet, 2x2 802.11ac mPCIe
Audio Capable of 5.1/7.1 digital output with HD audio bitstreaming (HDMI)
Operating System Retail unit is barebones, but we installed Windows 8.1 Pro x64
Pricing (As configured) $999
Full Specifications ASRock VisionX 471D Specifications

The VisionX 471D comes in a barebones configuration (i.e, no OS installed). However, the RAM and disk drives are already pre-installed. A DVD with the drivers and utilities is also supplied with the package. Usually, a USB key would be preferable. However, the unit comes with an optical drive, and that justifies the driver DVD. In any case, we ended up installing the latest drivers downloaded off ASRock's product support page. In addition to the main unit, the other components of the package include a 120 W (19V @ 6.32A) adapter, a power cord (customized to the country of sale), a MHL cable, a DVD to VGA adapter, a Media Center remote, an OEM version of CyberLink PowerDVD 10 and a quick-start guide. The internal setup also provides space for a second 2.5" drive. The package also includes appropriate SATA power and data cables as well as screws for mounting the optional drive.

The gallery below takes us around the hardware inside the unit.

The most interesting new component inside the unit is the ASint mSATA SSD. ASint seems to be more of an OEM supplier, given the fact that there is absolutely no reference to the SSDMSK256G-M1 model being used by ASRock anywhere on the Internet. Even ASint's product page doesn't carry the model as yet. In any case, thanks to easy accessibility, we were able to determine that the SSDMSK256G-M1 is based on the JMicron JMF667H combined with four IMFT 64 GB 20nm NAND chips. We have already carried out a detailed review of the reference kit with the new firmware. Readers now know what to expect - a decent performer that is also economical. While ASRock used to sell their premium Vision 3D PCs a couple of years back at $1000, we now have a 256 GB mSATA SSD integrated along with a Core i7 CPU at the same price.

In the table below, we have an overview of the various systems that we are comparing the ASRock VisionX 471D against. Note that they may not belong to the same market segment. The relevant configuration details of the machines are provided so that readers have an understanding of why some benchmark numbers are skewed for or against the ASRock VisionX 471D when we come to those sections.

Comparative PC Configurations
Aspect ASRock VisionX 471D
CPU Intel Core i7-4712MQ Intel Core i7-4712MQ
GPU AMD Radeon R9 M270X (1GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon R9 M270X (1GB GDDR5)
11-11-11-28 @ 1600 MHz
2x 4GB
ASint SSA304G08-EGN1B
11-11-11-28 @ 1600 MHz
2x 4GB
Storage ASint mSATA SSDMSK256G-M1
(256 GB; mSATA 6 Gb/s; 20nm; MLC))
Seagate Samsung Spinpoint M9T ST2000LM003
(2 TB; 2.5in SATA; 5400 RPM)
(256 GB; mSATA 6 Gb/s; 20nm; MLC))
Seagate Samsung Spinpoint M9T ST2000LM003
(2 TB; 2.5in SATA; 5400 RPM)
Wi-Fi Broadcom BCM4352 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter
(2x2 802.11ac - 867 Mbps)
Broadcom BCM4352 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter
(2x2 802.11ac - 867 Mbps)
Price (in USD, when built) $999 $999
Performance Metrics - I
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Zizy - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I don't see the point of this. Not good enough for fhd gaming, too expensive and power hungry for a HTPC.
    As for HTPC duties, what about testing 4K@60 and FHD@60 (both with H.265)? Not really needed now, but I would rather get something future proof, especially for this kind of money.
  • Daniel Egger - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I totally agree. My (Desktop-grade) Haswell Core i5 with 750 Ti OC uses less in Idle and only slightly more under FurMark load yet is a completely different beast allowing for Full HD gaming despite running very quietly and staying cool.
  • heffeque - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    If you want hardware h.265 4K60p, you'll have to wait until Carrizo comes around.
  • MLSCrow - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I honestly believe that Carrizo, is going to be the greatest HTPC/MiniGamingPC APU when it comes out and probably the first AMD processor that is worth purchasing since the Phenom II. Granted, they aren't going to release a Desktop version strait away if ever, and instead are releasing a Kaveri update, which is, meh, imo, but whatever...I'm just waiting for Zen to shock the world with it's Intel dominating performance, until Intel copies it, puts more money into it, and produces a better performing product, as they always have.
  • baii9 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I believe Intel had the lead on hardware 4k decode for a while, so stick with igpu? :)
  • kmmatney - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    yes - this is pretty neat, but you can get a laptop with better specs at this price, and inlcudes a screen and it portable. This system doesn't really need such a high end processor.
  • britjh22 - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link

    I'm guessing this would actually be decent at FHD gaming, just not at the presets/detail settings that are used for AT's testing. I would really like to see a second detail setting for FHD be tested, as just because it fails at ultra settings doesn't mean it would at high/medium.
  • boe - Tuesday, February 3, 2015 - link

    I definitely want lot's of 4K goodness! I don't care if it makes it bigger use heat radiators and lose the fan. Offer a black model to match my other HT equipment as well. Offer a model without a disc player as I'm only using this to stream from a server.
  • Rafterman - Saturday, February 21, 2015 - link

    H.265 not really needed now, I would dissagree. AFAICS H.265(HEVC) is fast replacing AVC.
  • ToTTenTranz - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    The GPU's PCB seems to be risen above the motherboard's level.
    Is the M270X a MXM module? Can it be changed?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now