Netac Z5 USB 3.1 Gen 2 Portable SSD Reviewby Ganesh T S on August 9, 2016 8:00 AM EST
The typical problem with high-speed passively-cooled DAS units is performance consistency. This may be influenced by thermal throttling and firmware caps on access rates to avoid overheating or other similar scenarios. This aspect is an important one, as the last thing that users want to see when copying over, say, 100 GB of data to the DAS unit, is the transfer rate going to USB 2.0 speeds. In order to identify whether the unit under test suffers from this problem, we instrumented our robocopy DAS benchmark suite to record the drive's read and write transfer rates while the robocopy process took place in the background. For supported drives, we also recorded the internal temperature of the drive during the process. The Netac Z5, unfortunately, doesn't support temperature read-out. The graph below show the speeds observed during our real-world DAS suite processing. The first three sets of writes and reads correspond to the photos suite. A small gap (for the transfer of the videos suite from the primary drive to the RAM drive) is followed by three sets for the next data set. Another small RAM-drive transfer gap is followed by three sets for the Blu-ray folder.
An important point to note here is that each of the first three blue and green areas correspond to 15.6 GB of writes and reads respectively. Throttling, if any, is apparent within the processing of the photos suite itself.
We do not see any performance consistency issues with the Netac Z5 at all.
The power consumed by the Netac Z5 512GB SSD was measured under multiple scenarios using Plugable's USBC-TKEY power delivery sniffer. These scenarios were triggered using CrystalDiskMark 5.1.2 x64 with a 8GB test file and each test separated by a 30s interval. The initial part of the graphs below show the idle power consumption of the drive. This is followed by the power consumed when CrystalDiskMark prepares the 8GB test file on the drive. The eight distinct segments that follow show the power consumption profile for the workloads (single-threaded sequential and random accesses with a queue depth of 32, followed by sequential and random accesses with a queue depth of 1). The first four segments correspond to read accesses and the last four to write accesses.
The idling power consumption during this testing was observed to be 1.88 W, while the peak power consumption was 7.85 W.
We also tracked the bus power consumption while processing the AnandTech DAS Suite (both the robocopy benchmarks as well as the PCMark 8 storage traces).
In this scenarion, the idling and peak power consumption numbers were observed to be 1.87W and 7.76 W respectively.
The absence of thermal throttling in the course of our DAS suite processing made us curious about the actual thermal behavior of the unit. Given that we had no way to track the internal SSDs' temperature, we opted to take thermal pictures of the exterior metal surface (using the FLIR One Thermal Imager for Android) after finishing the processing of our robocopy benchmarks (around the 1000s mark in the power consumption graph above).
We recorded temperatures of approximately 48C and 46C on either side. It is not very dangerous, but one should definitely expect the metal surface to become quite warm after subjecting the SSD to strenuous traffic.
In terms of actual thermal design, we were quite surprised to find that neither the SSD controllers nor the flash packages had any sort of thermal pad to aid in transferring the generated heat to the metal body. This means that the metal surface takes some time to heat up, but, the controller and flash temperatures could become unreasonably warm in the meanwhile. That said, we don't see that being a problem for typical DAS workloads.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Chaitanya - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkThose seq. writes are nothing special.
ganeshts - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkWith the right system and drivers, you can hit upwards of 600 MBps for real-world workloads. At this price point, I don't think there is a better performer. The SanDisk Extreme 900 also performs similarly.
Flunk - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkAt about $228, it's forgivable.
osxandwindows - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkThats the same performance of a thunderbolt 1 ssd.
R0H1T - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkThis thing's hot, quite literally, & not in a good way.
WorldWithoutMadness - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkand sooner or later we'll confront data loss because of bga solder fatigue
ganeshts - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkNo doubt the unit could do with better thermal design, but, transferring upwards of 250GB of data within a short time duration (that causes temperature of the metal case to reach 46C) is, I would imagine, not a frequent use-case.
Netac is already aware of the need for a better thermal solution.
cygnus1 - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkYeah, I think if they just added a thermal pad that would let the heat transfer away to the case from the pertinent chops quicker than through the PCB and open air to the case would go a long way in keeping the device cooler overall.
kaidenshi - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkI did that with a 2.5" external spinning HDD that was getting too hot; put a thermal pad between its base and the metal USB 3.0 case. That kept it about 15C cooler than the cloth pad(!) they had glued in there, and kept vibrations down as well.
Samus - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - linkA common misconception with mSATA SSD's is their thermal profile.
They run incredibly hot. My Samsung 840 mSATA SSD idles at 47 degrees C with a load temp in the low 60's.
It's been this way for years and hasn't failed. Samsung, Lite On and Micron all rate their OEM SSD's at a working temp of 0-75C. Yes, 75 Celsius is actually within design specifications!
A lot of it has to do with the PCB. The shape of the mSATA SSD, in addition to it operating at a higher voltage than m2, create a less efficient therma design. But that doesn't make it unreliable, just unusual as far as why we consider the 'norm' for storage temperatures which have historically considered 30-40C to be ideal.
But interestingly even Backblaze has shown in their reliability survey (which I have always found unrealistic because it only considers cold storage applications) that 'high' hard disk temperatures have little correlation to reliability even when approaching 50C. In fact it is low temperatures, below 30C, that have a connection to disk failure. Not unreasonable evidence when you think about the thermal dynamics of spinning metal disks; metals wears less at higher temperatures...bearings, motors, etc.
I understand SSD's are entirely different physics and there is no ideal operating temperature, or rather it is a significantly wider range, but really the only temperature concern with NAND is during cold storage where 20-25C is substantially more ideal than above 30C.