I recently had an opportunity to take a meeting with Toshiba in San Francisco. Meetings with reps from major notebook vendors are oftentimes an exercise in enthusiasm coupled with frustration; I usually like the direction a company is taking their designs (Toshiba in particular still never seems to get the attention they deserve when HP and Dell continue to languish, chasing their tails), and then when I ask for the speeds and feeds the display is invariably 1366x768. Cue the lecture.

That's why Toshiba's KIRAbook was such a welcome surprise. It's a good looking ultrabook, employing a magnesium alloy shell and Corning Concore Glass, and if it's not exceptionally original in its aesthetic it's at least very well built and specced to please. I'll get into details about its fit and finish later, but for now, all you need to know is this:

13.3" IPS 2560x1440 display. Standard.

It's true we're still essentially stuck with the 16:9 aspect ratio on the PC side while Apple's 13" Retina MacBook Pro offers a 2560x1600 panel, but this is still a very welcome change of pace.

As for the rest of the KIRAbook, Toshiba's reps talked a heavy game about its design and for what it's worth, they raise excellent points. The port layout is smart, the keyboard was designed specifically to avoid backlight bleed from the individual keys, and they're using specially engineered Harmon Kardon speakers that are surprisingly loud for such a slim chassis. Impressively, the whole thing is just 2.6 pounds.

Unfortunately it all comes at a price. The starting model is $1,599 and comes with an Intel Core i5 ULV processor; upgrading to the $1,799 model gets you 10-point multitouch on the display, and the $1,999 model adds an upgrade to a Core i7.

You do get 8GB of DDR3-1600, the QHD IPS display, a 50Wh battery, and a 256GB SSD standard in all models, along with useful Adobe Photoshop Elements 11 and Premiere Elements 11 pack-in software and a standard two-year warranty with 24/7 phone support and basically a dedicated department specifically for handling and servicing KIRA models (it's safe to assume more are en route.) Examining the model, I also found that the bottom panel uses standard Phillips head screws, so theoretically you can swap out the SSD and wireless card, though the RAM is probably soldered to the motherboard.

Either way, we're looking to have a KIRAbook in house for review in time for launch, so stay tuned. Pre-orders start May 3, and the KIRAbook becomes available for purchase on May 12.

Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • dgingeri - Thursday, April 18, 2013 - link

    you have a Toshiba that has actually lasted a while. Well, you're one of very, very few. I can tell you that.
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, April 18, 2013 - link

    this is awesome hardware but how the heck are you supposed to use that high of DPI in windows? the only thing it will work with is the metro apps since those are designed for high DPI natively... but desktop? yeah right.

    im hoping windows blue fixes desktop DPI scaling and goes to the same kind of solution mac OS X has.
  • JDG1980 - Thursday, April 18, 2013 - link

    DPI scaling in Windows 7 works quite well, except for a couple of specific ill-behaved applications. What were you having trouble with?
  • ShieTar - Monday, April 22, 2013 - link

    Scaling was working quiet well in Windows XP too, I've been using the 120DPI setting on my 30" screen for almost a decade now. Hardly any pieces of "work" related software had problems with it, but quiet a few games did.

    Also, I've never owned a Retina-Device myself, but wasn't the mac OS solution just to switch software between the original solution or a 2-screen-pixel-per-software-pixel scaling, rather than allowing a defined scaling?
  • Benjamin Pabellon Corpus - Monday, April 29, 2013 - link

    Does this have a firewire connector?
  • phoenix_rizzen - Friday, May 3, 2013 - link

    It's bad enough figuring out the difference between HD, FullHD, TrueHD, HD+, but now they want us to remember the difference between qHD (quarter HD aka 960x540) and QHD (quad HD aka 2560x1440 also sometimes referred to as 2K?). As if the people who can't figure out the difference between MB and Mb will be able to properly differentiate between qHD and QHD.

    They really need better names for "standard" resolutions.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now