ASUS G73Jw: Out with the Old, In with the New
by Jarred Walton on November 3, 2010 12:33 AM ESTASUS G73Jw: Out with the Old, In with the New
Six months is a long time in the computer industry, or so we’ve told ourselves on more than one occasion. If you’re looking for the best time to upgrade, there’s always something new just around the corner. Our first encounter with ASUS’ G73Jh was impressive, so much so that it garnered our Gold Editors’ Choice award. It had great performance and features at an amazing price, often beating gaming notebooks that cost 30 to 50 percent more! And that brings us to our updated G73Jw, which keeps most of the features of the Jh model but adds a few twists. Here’s the spec rundown.
ASUS G73Jw-A1 Specifications | |
Processor |
Intel Core i7-740QM (4x1.73GHz, 45nm, 6MB L3, Turbo to 2.93GHz, 45W) |
Chipset | Intel HM55 |
Memory | 4x2GB DDR3-1333 (Max 8GB) |
Graphics |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M 1.5GB GDDR5 192 SPs, 675/1350/625MHz Core/Shader/RAM clocks (2.5GHz effective RAM clock) |
Display |
17.3" LED Glossy 16:9 1080p (1920x1080) (HannStar HSD173PUW1) |
Hard Drive(s) |
2x500GB 7200RPM HDD (non-RAID) (Seagate Momentus 7200.4 ST9500420AS) |
Optical Drive | Blu-ray/DVDR Combo (Slimtype BDE DS4E1S) |
Networking |
Gigabit Ethernet (Atheros AR8131) 802.11n WiFI (Atheros AR9285) Bluetooth 2.1+EDR (Broadcom BT-270) |
Audio |
EAX Enhanced HD 5.0 Audio (2.1 speakers + subwoofer) Microphone and headphone jacks Capable of 5.1 digital output (HDMI) |
Battery | 8-Cell, 14.6V, 5.2Ah, 75Wh |
Front Side | Power/Battery/HDD/WiFi indicator lights |
Left Side |
Headphone Jack Microphone Jack 2 x USB 2.0 Optical Drive (BD-ROM/DVDRW) Ethernet |
Right Side |
Memory Card Reader 1 x USB 2.0 1 x USB 3.0 HDMI VGA AC Power Connection |
Back Side |
2 x Exhaust vent Kensington Lock |
Operating System | Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit |
Dimensions | 16.54" x 12.20" x 0.74-2.24" (WxDxH) |
Weight | 8.47 lbs (with 8-cell battery) |
Extras |
Gaming (Laser) Mouse ASUS Backpack 2MP Webcam 102-Key keyboard with 10-key Flash reader (SD, MMC, MS-Duo, Smart Media, xD) |
Warranty |
2-year limited global warranty 1-year accidental damage and battery warranty |
Pricing |
Online starting at $1675 (Note: Frequently backordered at many sites) |
So what has changed? We have USB 3.0, HDMI 1.4, the i7-740QM, and a GeForce GTX 460M now, and the test unit also has a Blu-ray combo drive (which is available on G73Jh as well),but otherwise this is an identical notebook to what we reviewed in April. Obviously the addition of USB 3.0 is a big bullet item, and it involves some tweaks to the motherboard layout to make room for the additional chip. The CPU upgrade is nice in that the 740QM is nearly the same as the old 820QM—a base 1.73GHz clock—but with a slightly lower maximum Turbo mode. The other two changes come courtesy of the GPU switch; only the GeForce 400 series (desktop and mobile) supports HDMI 1.4, along with the new AMD 6800 cards. If you need 3D output for an HDTV, HDMI 1.4 is useful, but most users probably aren’t dying to get that feature (especially since outside of HDTVs, it’s still difficult to find computer LCDs with HDMI 1.4 connections).
The most difficult part of the equation is the GPU “upgrade”, because even without running a single benchmark we’re skeptical about whether the GTX 460M is any better than the HD 5870. We looked at two identical notebooks with GTX 285M and HD 5870 in June, and it’s no surprise that HD 5870 came out on top. What was surprising is that 5870 typically bested 285M by around 10 to 15% on average, and it wasn’t long before NVIDIA countered with the 480M. Using the same i7-820QM CPU (but with a different storage solution), the 480M regained the lead but only by a similar 10 to 15% average. Now we’re looking at the 460M, which has 22% less memory bandwidth and 14% less shader power than the 480M, making it roughly equal to the 5870 on paper.
The net result at first glance looks like we’re getting a minor CPU bump, a couple extra features, and a sideways move on the graphics. Traditionally NVIDIA and AMD trade blows depending on the games, so we should see a few titles where the G73Jw comes out ahead of the G73Jh and a few that go the other way, with others basically tied. NVIDIA also has the CUDA and PhysX cards to play, which might sway your vote. With the changes that have been made, one thing that remains about the same is the price. The G73Jh with the slower CPU and no Blu-ray support debuted at $1500; you can find the G73Jw for $1675 (though it's backordered at many resellers), and you can still buy the G73Jh (also with Blu-ray and an i7-740QM) for $1634, so the added cost pretty much goes to the BRD combo drive and a slightly faster CPU. That means the choice really boils down to GTX 460M with USB 3.0, or HD 5870 and $40.
Beyond the above discussion, the G73 remains a great gaming notebook. It’s large and doesn’t get stellar battery life, but that’s no surprise. It’s fast and runs generally cool and quiet, plus the stealth bomber look is a change of pace from all the glossy plastic notebooks floating around. If you didn’t like the G73Jh enough to take the plunge, it’s doubtful the G73Jw is going to change your mind, but perhaps USB 3.0 is enough to make the difference? We’ve run it through our usual set of benchmarks and tests, so we’ll see what the upgrades do for performance and if battery life is any better, but as far as our general impression of the notebook it remains the same. You can read our previous review for more details, but throw in Blu-ray and USB 3.0.
53 Comments
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Friday, November 12, 2010 - link
Not that I know of. I set the system for maximum performance, turned off and GPU power saving features I could see, and the result was still less than GT 335M performance when on battery.Sadaiyappan - Wednesday, November 10, 2010 - link
Can you explain in detail all the graphics settings you used for that Dirt 2 test? I have an MSI GX660R-060US but I am not getting the scores that the MSI GX640 got.Luke2.0 - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link
Hi there,The spec table shows 8-cell 75wh, but the battery charts all shows G73jw used a 85wh.
Which one is correct?
And after clearing this, perhaps you could re-verify the better battery life: is it due to the stronger battery (85wh against 75wh) or G73jw being a MUCH more efficient system?
Thanks.