LAS VEGAS, NV – Late last year, at Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Tech Event in Hawaii, we had the formal introduction of the first devices that were using the new Windows on Snapdragon platform and Qualcomm’s dream of bringing mobile technology to laptops to provide ‘Always Connected PCs’, connected through an LTE data connection. Qualcomm sells the upsides of this technology of providing laptops with 20hrs+ of battery life through using a smartphone processor, and through working with Microsoft, have a full version of proper Windows based on the system. The devices use native apps for best performance through the Windows Store, however 32-bit apps are machine translated into instructions that the Snapdragon SoC can process. It’s a lot of technology in a tiny device, and Qualcomm would seem to be the first CPU manufacturer to actually pull off x86 translation for the consumer market.

All of that aside, one of the first devices that should enter the market is the ASUS NovaGo. This is a 13-inch premium laptop/360-degree 2-in-1 design that has features such as Windows Hello and a fingerprint sensor built in while maintaining ASUS’ laptop quality and claiming up to 22 hours of battery life. We have wanted to get our hands on one for a while, and I managed to get a couple of minutes at the show with one at the ASUS suite.

Truth be told, the main fear that we have had with these devices is responsiveness. Smartphones on Android can be fast, with but something much bigger like Windows, it was not always on the cards that we would get the same level of responsiveness as, say, a Y-series Intel design. Back when we saw a super-early demo behind closed doors at IFA, it wasn’t the fastest, but on the NovaGo at least, everything seemed in order. Basic applications were quick and easy to open, and no visible lag from my untrained eye. Using the native compiled version of Edge, the best website in the world loaded as it normally does, and I was able to navigate the device as I would do normally with an Intel based laptop. Being familiar with ASUS’ device design, there were no surprises in the feel of the keyboard and touchpad either. Port support extends to a 3.5mm jack, a HDMI port, and two USB 3.0 ports.

A quick look through the system settings showed eight Snapdragon 835 cores, the Adreno graphics, and a PCIe based SSD for storage if I remember correctly. With it being connected to the internet, I tried downloading CPU-Z, even in 32-bit, but it required me adding it through the Store page to get it to work. Alas, the Wi-Fi at the Las Vegas Encore was not giving me any favors with the Windows Store so I was unable to go down that route, so at some point I obviously want to see the effects of x86 translation.

We were told by Qualcomm at the event a number of interesting things about the design of the platform, and how it has changed since we last met with them. Windows scheduler is configured to deal with cores of different level of performance, and it knows what programs are where and how to deal with them for performance and power, much like a good Android based scheduler. This was one of our worries, but we were categorically told that any internal worries they ever had are now fixed and it should run like a well-oiled machine.

In gaming, Qualcomm stated that with the modern APIs, the Adreno GPU is natively compiled and doesn’t need translation. As a result, due to the way that Adreno works, for some titles it ends up being more computationally efficient over other solutions and causes less work on the CPU, allowing for more of the power budget on the GPU and an overall better frame rate. Obviously we want to get a hold of the device and test the claim, but if offers an interesting prospect.

As for the NovaGo, with the addition of LTE and if it stands up to the battery life claims, it could be a neat little device depending on the price. ASUS said they expect it to launch sometime during Q2.

Related Reading

POST A COMMENT

76 Comments

View All Comments

  • versesuvius - Friday, January 19, 2018 - link

    ARM based chips don't use much more than 1 W when they are not "sleeping" and running many programs. So, it is supposedly the power consumption that makes this laptop a wonderful thing. Intel is advertising "Always Connected" with its products that use much more powerful CPUs that have higer TDPs. So, your case about <1W is moot. You do not seem to understand the difference between "sleeping" and a screen saver that saves some power mostly in the display department. Reply
  • serendip - Friday, January 19, 2018 - link

    Most new Intel Core and Atom chips have a very low power mode just above idle that allows for Connected Standby on Windows - WiFi is always on and the CPU can respond to network events but everything else is turned off. Intel's Always Connected branding extends this concept to LTE connectivity by using Intel XMM modems. It remains to be seen how much power is consumed by Intel chips in their connected states.

    Of course, Snapdragon platforms have been able to do this for years with low power states and always-on networking. Android sleep isn't a screensaver, modern mobiles OSes like Android and iOS are engineered from the ground up to run minimal cores at low speeds yet still remain responsive to network events. You're correct in pointing out that ARM chips can happily work with 1 W only and that means long battery life in these ARM PCs.
    Reply
  • peevee - Thursday, January 18, 2018 - link

    "A quick look through the system settings showed eight Snapdragon 835 cores"

    That makes no sense - Snapdragon 835 is not a core.
    Reply
  • CyberAngel777 - Sunday, April 8, 2018 - link

    "A quick look through the system settings showed eight Snapdragon 835 Kryo 280 cores"
    added the missing "Kryo 280" - Happy?
    Reply
  • Wolfpup - Thursday, January 18, 2018 - link

    Obviously I'm super interested about how this will work. Obviously the Windows RT devices SHOULD have had x86 support, AND they really ought to offer a Windows 10 upgrade for like the Surface 1 and 2, with this x86 support, even if it would probably run slow...

    Anyway very interesting, and I hadn't thought of the fact that really the GPU ought to run just normal Windows code with the right drivers, that the CPU architecture really shouldn't matter. Very interesting to see if it could run real Windows games of some sort that are x86...
    Reply
  • serendip - Friday, January 19, 2018 - link

    Not likely, the Tegra SoCs on the Surface RT machines were a nightmare of proprietary drivers and proprietary boot processes. They're also much slower than today's flagship ARM SoCs. There's been a lot of progress done in the past few years on standardising bus connectivity on ARM platforms. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now