For years now Apple has followed a rather intelligent waterfall of its products down the pricing stack. With the arrival of every new iPhone, the previous generation gets a $100 discount from its on-contract price, and the generation before that one is offered for free on-contract. In the early days of this strategy, it was a great way to continue to build up the iOS user base without having to compete in the lower margin feature phone space. The strategy worked quite well.

During the days of the iPhone 4S the strategy made a ton of sense, as the 3GS was undoubtedly cheaper to manufacturer than the glass + metal iPhone 4 and 4S designs. No attention was paid to the impact on the iOS brand however of having a bunch of customers walking around with new 3GSes as recently as late 2011.

With the iPhone 5s however, Apple was caught in an interesting situation. The previous model leveraged the same industrial design, and it’s definitely not a cheap one at that. Capacitive touchscreen display costs increase with display size, making the iPhone 5’s display a more expensive option than its predecessor. Add in other flagship features like in-cell touch and premium construction and the iPhone 5 quickly became a device that Apple would rather not discount.

Keep in mind that Apple built its phone business much like it built its Mac business, by focusing exclusively on higher margin products. The incredible volumes that followed were a side effect of the state of the industry, not a deliberate change in business model. With its core motivations unchanged, Apple needed a solution to continue to make the 3 phone strategy work. The solution is the iPhone 5c:

The iPhone 5c leverages the entirety of the iPhone 5 hardware platform, but moves from a glass + aluminum construction down to a more cost effective glass + polycarbonate design. The iPhone 5c retains all other features of the iPhone 5 including in-cell touch, Lightning connector, the same rear facing iSight camera stack and A6 SoC. It even brings some new features to the table like sharing the same front facing FaceTime HD camera as the iPhone 5s. Other elements aren’t necessarily newer but are at least shared with the 5s platform. For example, the WiFi, cellular and BT hardware is different than the iPhone 5, but shared across the 5c and 5s. Having as many common components between Apple’s two iPhones at this point is another great way to capitalize on economies of scale.

The savings on materials however is enough to allow Apple to sell the iPhone 5c in place of the outgoing 5. With a 2-year contract Apple expects a 16GB 5c to sell for $99, and a 32GB for $199. These are exactly the same price points you’d expect the iPhone 5 to drop to after the introduction of the 5s. Anyone expecting the 5c to be Apple’s solution for volume in China or somehow compete in the feature phone space will be disappointed. At the same time, anyone who is familiar with Apple’s business will know that a low cost volume play was never in the cards.

The 5c comes in iPod touch-like packaging but still includes a pair of Apple EarPods (with remote and mic), a 5W wall adapter and a Lightning cable.

  Apple iPhone 5 Apple iPhone 5c Apple iPhone 5s
SoC Apple A6 Apple A6 Apple A7
Display 4-inch 1136 x 640 LCD sRGB coverage with in-cell touch
WiFi 2.4/5GHz 802.11a/b/g/n, BT 4.0
Storage 16GB/32GB/64GB 16GB/32GB 16GB/32GB/64GB
I/O Lightning connector, 3.5mm headphone
Current OS iOS 7
Battery 1440 mAh, 3.8V, 5.45 Whr 1507 mAh, 3.8V, 5.73 Whr 1570 mAh, 3.8V, 5.96 Whr
Size / Mass 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm, 112 grams 124.4 x 59.2 x 8.97 mm, 132 grams 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm, 112 grams
Camera 8MP iSight with 1.4µm pixels Rear Facing
1.2MP with 1.75µm pixels Front Facing
8MP iSight with 1.4µm pixels Rear Facing
1.2MP with 1.9µm pixels Front Facing
8MP iSight with 1.5µm pixels Rear Facing + True Tone Flash
1.2MP with 1.9µm pixels Front Facing
Price $199 (16GB), $299 (32GB), $399 (64GB) on 2 year contract $99 (16GB), $199 (32GB) on 2 year contract $199 (16GB), $299 (32GB), $399 (64GB) on 2 year contract

In fact if we look back at the period of netbook success during the late 2000s, Apple was often under pressure to compete in that space. Instead of putting out a low cost PC competitor, Apple eventually brought the iPad to market - a completely different device, with a very different cost structure, to compete with those lower cost PCs. I don’t know that Apple has to do the same thing here, but if you’re looking for an ultra cheap mobile computing device from Apple - it may not look like a phone.

iPhone 5c (left) vs. iPhone 5s (right)

The smartphone market is definitely maturing. We’ve passed the point of everyone being an early adopter to smartphones now encompassing a larger section of the technology buying pyramid. For people further away from the early adopter summit (further down the pyramid), carrying the absolute latest technology isn’t always at the top of the purchasing decision tree. We are seeing an increased number of smartphone manufacturers play with the use of color in their devices to go after this more mainstream market where the color of your phone may be just as important (if not more) than what SoC is inside.

Motorola recently embraced this trend by offering a huge number of color customizations on the Moto X. We’ve had brightly colored phones from HTC in the past as well, and there’s no way we can have a discussion of color without mentioning Nokia of course. With the 5c, Apple joins the ranks of smartphone companies shipping phones in pretty colors - a side benefit of the iPhone 5c being made out of a polycarbonate material.

The iPhone 5c isn’t, of course, Apple’s first polycarbonate phone. The iPhone 3G and 3GS both relied on plastics before an eventual transition to the glass + metal combination that we got with the newer iPhones.

The 5c is available in five colors: blue, white, green, yellow and pink. I was sampled a pink 5c. Color preferences can definitely get very personal, but for what it’s worth I really like the pink 5c. It’s sort of a combination of pink and coral rather than a bright pink.

The final finish on the 5c is smooth and looks a lot like what you see when you open up a can of brightly colored paint. As with all plastic/polycarbonate phones with a glossy finish, smudges are easily picked up by the iPhone 5c. The colors are light/bright enough where smudges on the device aren’t hugely distracting though, and of course the smooth back surface is easy to wipe off.

Apple offers a line of first party cases for the iPhone 5c. These are soft touch silicon rubber cases, and they are available in six different colors (white, black, blue, yellow, green and pink). Apple’s iPhone 5c cases still allow some color to shine through on the front, and are perforated with large holes to let color through on the back as well. I can’t say I’m a huge fan of the styling of the back of the case but otherwise I like them. The rubber surface is grippy and the inside of the case is made of a microfiber-like material to prevent scratching. I’ve found that the holes on the back of the case do let dirt in between the case and the phone unfortunately.

The combination of 5c color and case color is Apple’s answer to those who want even more customization on the styling of their phone. Similar to what Motorola is doing with the Moto X, the default background of your 5c will match the color you purchase.

The iPhone 5c follows largely the same shape as the iPhone 5 and 5s, but with a twist. Since the 5c’s back is built from a polycarbonate material, it’s much easier to deliver smoothly rounded corners and edges. The result is a device that feels great in hand. I’d actually argue that other than the added weight, the 5c maybe even feels better in hand than the iPhone 5/5s. The same complaints that apply to the 5/5s obviously apply to the 5c - mainly that if you want a bigger display, you’re not getting one here.

The 5c follows the same button layout as the iPhone 5/5s. Power/lock is up top, volume up/down are on the left with the silence switch and there’s a physical home button on the front of the device. Unlike the iPhone 5s, the 5c doesn’t get Touch ID so the home button looks no different than it did on the iPhone 5.

All of the buttons on the 5c feel great, something Brian noticed in his hands on with the device. The internal vibrator motor feels identical to that of the iPhone 5s, and at a slightly higher frequency compared to the original iPhone 5. Again I wouldn’t be too surprised to see as much parts bin sharing as possible between the 5s and 5c.


The iPhone 5c's display is identical to that of the iPhone 5 and 5s. It's the same 4-inch 1136 x 640 Retina Display that Apple launched last year. Apple seems to multi-source the panel as the quality of the one in my 5c review sample was the best iPhone Retina Display I've ever tested. I'm presenting a subset of our display tests below, if you want more detail you can check out our iPhone 5s review:

Brightness (White)

Brightness (Black)

Contrast Ratio


CalMAN Display Performance - Gretag Macbeth Average dE 2000

The 5c's display is incredibly bright, has the best color reproduction of any other phone we've tested and has more than enough contrast.

Internally Apple is quite proud of the steel reinforced frame that gives the iPhone 5c its rigidity. In practice, the 5c has virtually no noticeable chassis flex. It’s an easy victory for Apple because the 5c doesn’t have to be a flagship device, and thus doesn’t have to be as thin as possible. Apple can rely on the 5s pursuing the as-thin-as-can-be market, giving the 5c room to be a bit thicker and thus feel a bit more solid. I agree with Brian in that not all plastic/polycarbonate devices have to feel cheap (see: HTC, Nokia), and the iPhone 5c definitely doesn’t. It’s a different feel than the softer/matte polycarbonate designs I’ve seen in that it’s definitely more slippery.

Battery Life

AT Smartphone Bench 2013: Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

AT Smartphone Bench 2013: Web Browsing Battery Life (4G LTE)

Cellular Talk Time

AT Smartphone Bench 2013: GLBenchmark 2.5.1 Battery Life

I do see some small changes in battery life results compared to the iPhone 5, but at this point I’m chalking that up to minor hardware differences in the 5c as well as the fact that we are comparing across iOS versions here (iOS 7 on the 5c vs. iOS 6 on the 5). Web browsing battery life on the 5c is quite good, but if you stress the SoC a lot or look at call time performance the 5c's behavior is mostly dictated by battery capacity, which is definitely more middle of the road rather than flagship.

CPU Performance

The performance of the 5c under iOS 7 is still quite good. I feel like Apple outpaced its own software requirements with the iPhone 5s’ A7 SoC as iOS feels pretty quick on both platforms at this point. Obviously the big downside to going with the 5c over the slightly more expensive 5s is that you lose 64-bit support and do have a much slower CPU, both of which may become more of a pain if you keep the phone for a long time.

Octane and SunSpider both have the iPhone 5c doing relatively well for a non-flagship device, but the platform's performance in Kraken is starting to look quite dated. Browsermark is arguably the most interesting test here as it attempts to present a holistic view of browser performance rather than just focusing on js subtests. Under Browsermark, the still looks quite competitive.

Google Octane Benchmark v1

Mozilla Kraken Benchmark - 1.1

SunSpider Javascript Benchmark 1.0 - Stock Browser

Browsermark 2.0

GPU Performance

The latest flagship smartphones have pushed GPU performance far beyond where Apple was with the PowerVR SGX 543MP3 last year. Performance at the 5c's native display resolution is still quite compelling, but if you want the platform to last for a few years in terms of usable 3D gaming life it will definitely age quicker than the 5s or any of the Adreno 320/330 based flagships we've tested.

Basemark X - On Screen

GLBenchmark 2.7 - T-Rex HD

GLBenchmark 2.7 - T-Rex HD (Offscreen 1080p)

3DMark Unlimited - Ice Storm

Camera, Cellular & WiFi

Rear camera quality of the iPhone 5c is identical to the iPhone 5 as it is physically the same camera module. The front facing camera on the other hand is identical to the iPhone 5s. The result is a pair of competent shooters, but you definitely don’t get the move forward in low light performance from the 5s. I won’t go too deep into the camera analysis here as Brian did a great job of that in his piece on the original iPhone 5.

Cellular and WiFi performance seem identical between the iPhone 5c and iPhone 5s. Apple claims both platforms are using the same hardware and have roughly the same antenna layouts. The 5c’s internal steel frame plays a double role as an antenna, although we won’t know exactly how until someone tears one of these down. Just like the 5s, the 5c features the same support for up to 13 LTE bands depending on the model:

Apple iPhone 5S and 5C Banding
iPhone Model GSM / EDGE Bands WCDMA Bands FDD-LTE Bands TDD-LTE Bands CDMA 1x / EVDO Rev A/B Bands

5S- A1533 (GSM)
5C- A1532

850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz 850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25 N/A N/A

5S- A1533 (CDMA)
5C- A1532

800, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz

5S- A1453
5C- A1456

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26
5S- A1457
5C- A1507
850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 N/A
5S- A1530
5C- A1529
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 38, 39, 40


Apple iPhone 5S/5C FCC IDs and Models
FCC ID Model
BCG-E2642A A1453 (5S) A1533 (5S)
BCG-E2644A A1456 (5C) A1532 (5C)
BCG-E2643A A1530 (5S)
BCG-E2643B A1457 (5S)
BCG-E2694A A1529 (5C)
BCG-E2694B A1507 (5C)

iOS & Software

The iPhone 5c ships with iOS 7 from the factory. Apple also recently made iPhoto, iMovie and its iWork suite free for anyone who buys a new iPhone preloaded with iOS 7 (the iPhone 5c and 5s). The list includes iPhoto, iMovie, Pages, Numbers and Keynote, a pretty substantial collection given how much Apple used to charge for all of them in the past ($40 total). Apple is clearly mimicking its successful Mac strategy here, leveraging software as a way to sell hardware. I’m actually surprised the five apps don’t come preloaded on the 5c, although I wouldn’t be too shocked to see that change in the future.

Final Words

The iPhone 5c is a well built device. For all intents and purposes it is a perfect replacement for the iPhone 5. If you were planning on buying a cost reduced iPhone 5 once the 5s came out, the iPhone 5c should have no problems filling that role. Its performance, battery life and camera quality are all on par with the 5.

Apple’s return to a polycarbonate iPhone design seems to have gone quite well. The iPhone 5c is solid, doesn’t have any noticeable amount of flex and has a great in hand feel thanks to its nicely curved edges. I feel like the color options will go over very well with the 5c’s target markets. I can see many users even preferring the styling of the 5c to the 5s in those markets that aren’t feature/performance sensitive.

Personally I’d prefer the iPhone 5s simply because of its more modern platform, even if I were recommending a device for someone else not as concerned with performance. Supporting the latest ISA (which will probably stick around for a while) and OpenGL ES 3.0 are both important if you’re going to be keeping your phone for a very long time and plan on using it for more than just the basic first party apps.

As I said before though, if your plan all along was to buy an iPhone 5 - the iPhone 5c is a clear substitute good. I don’t expect that we’ll see an even cheaper version, but I am excited for what happens when the 5s hardware waterfalls into the 5c replacement next year.

Apple throwing its hat into the multi-device race marks a very important change for the company. I’ve always believed that the smartphone space would end up looking a lot like the PC industry, or in Apple’s case, the Mac business. Apple presently offers a handful of Mac notebooks, and I see no reason why Apple will stop at two with the iPhone.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Calista - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link

    Fully agree, using a HTC phone made of mostly plastic right now and it's built like a tank. No flex, no squeaking. It feels just as well made as say the iPhone 5 even if it's lacking a bit of the design flair of the latter. All this while still using a replaceable battery. So yes, Samsung do have a cheap feeling among their phones.
  • Dentons - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link

    You clearly haven't used Samsung's latest phones. The Note II case is as solid as plastic phones get. Every bit as solid as a Lumia.

    I don't know why you don't like Samsung phones, but it clearly isn't the reason you've stated.
  • Allicox - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link

    Apple is better! It looks better and it isn't confusing. This is about the new apple phones. If you like the HTC go talk on there page.
  • Impulses - Thursday, September 19, 2013 - link

    If you can't handle a civil discussion then AT isn't for you, perhaps Engadget? Comparisons are always relevant, good or bad.
  • mporter - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link

    It's a great device, there's no denying that.. but I don't see how you could justify spending so much on a phone when you could get so much more for your money.. for example the HTC One -
  • Vjgoh - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link

    A long feature list doesn't necessarily make a great phone. The Galaxy S4 has more 'features' than an HTC One, but I'm of the opinion that you'd have to be crazy to pick the Samsung.

    The 5c has a few things going for it that close the gap:
    - iWork is now free ($40 value, if you decide to take all of them)
    - Service is a well known strength of Apple. If you've got trouble, it's easier to get help.
    - The AppleCare+ warranty is pretty nice (but it costs $100 up front)
    - The Apple App Store still has better apps. That's a mildly subjective call, but most dual users of Android/iOS that I know agree with the statement.
    - The accessories market for any iPhone is huge.
    - Resale value of Apple products is high

    So while on a spec-for-spec basis, I can't argue, the intangibles can really stack up for some people. Not everyone needs as much phone as the One provides and like the ease of use, reduced complexity/customization and high levels of service that they get from Apple.
  • ESC2000 - Saturday, September 21, 2013 - link

    Hmmm let's see.
    -apple throwing in a suite of overly priced underperforming apps, of which there are comparable or better free apps on android? I hardly think that can be counted as a plus. It can be counted an Apple's favorite strategy of overcharging for something and then lowering the price to make it seem like a deal. Also I've never been more frustrated than I was trying to use iWork, etc.
    -Apple's service is good but it will cost you an arm and a leg which eats into the resale value
    -better apps? You can plausibly claim that in the tablet space perhaps but it is a tired and outdated argument in the phone space. You know you're reaching for an argument when that's all you can come up with other than they're giving you iWork, etc for free...
    -accessories... Maybe apple is better there.. Not really sure because I don't care... If they're coming from apple itself, again it'll cost an arm and a leg and eat into the resale money you're planning on. See the $39 case for the 5c. Anyone spending $40 on a little flap of plastic has too much money and/or too little sense.
    -resale... See all the points above
    -you conspicuously failed to mention a huge difference between the HTC one and the iPhone 5c and 5s which is not a gimmick at all: the iPhone's tiny low rez screen and unnecessarily large bezels.... The screen is one of the most important things about the phone since it is the way we interface with it
    -also the construction of the one is nicer than the iPhone 5C
    -camera is better on the one... The 5c has the same camera as the 5 which was good but HTC really did an excellent job with their camera
    -also I can't remember off the top of my head but doesn't the $550 one come with 32 GB? On phones with no good external storage, 32 GB should be the bare minimum for a high end phone. 16 GB is 2012 as is ripping consumers off by charging them $100 for each extra 16 GB
    -I'm tired of making this list haha but you get the point... if anand's theory that people don't cross shop is true, then this discussion is moot, but my recent personal observations are that my iOS friends are getting increasingly restless. I've been asked about other options several times in the last half year. The market results will confirm or disconfirm this.
  • xmen77 - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link

    Apple please do in the next iPhone:
    4.5 inch screen
    The thin bezels
    At least 720p resolution
    In 2 or 1.5 times more than the current camera sensor
    Aspherical lenses in the lens
    Optical stabilization
    Support for 4K video to zoom during video recording
    12 MP for the zoom during shooting
    4 GB of RAM for 64 bit processor
    4 cores (they are more effective than the 2 very powerful)
    Dynamically change the
    If you do I will definitely buy it and I will advertise it in all the social networks and sites as the best smartphone
  • ESC2000 - Saturday, September 21, 2013 - link

    Sounds like a big improvement. I approve. But I still couldn't stomach iOS after tasting a modicum of freedom. Maybe I could if iOS would let me set my default keyboard, video player, etc. That's a pipe dream, though.
  • uhuznaa - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link

    I don't buy that the plastic case does anything substantial to lower the costs. If you look at the BOM of the iPhone 5 the costs of the case are buried somewhere in the about $5 of overall construction. I would be very surprised if the actual cost delta between the 5/5s case and the 5c case would be much more than maybe $2 or $3.

    Apple just needed to have a cheaper looking device to sell it at a lower margin without having people wonder about the margins of the more expensive model. It's all about spreading your product palette a bit.

    It's still hideously expensive, though. As usual people don't feel this in the US ($99 on contract isn't that much), but in Europe the 16 GB 5c is at €599 unlocked (that's $800!). I can get a Nexus 7 AND a Galaxy S3 for that. Or a Nexus 7 32 GB LTE and a nice Nokia Lumia. The iPhone 5c will not help Apple with market share (and market power) outside of the US. In China iOS is at 4.8% right now and falling. Guess what platform new apps come out for?

    To be honest think pricing the 5c at $299 unlocked (and free with a contract) would have been Apple's last chance to turn the ship around. It would have meant much smaller margins but soaring market share (and with that iOS becoming relevant in markets it just isn't right now). Without that iOS will continue to shrink into a luxury niche. The golden bling 5s seems to symbolize this very nicely.

    Still, nice phone, I actually like the white one. Not for that kind of money though. Apple is focussing on insane profits instead of market share and while this may be good for them (at least in the short run) it's not good for me.

    To the "plastic" question: You people are crazy. Good construction is good construction, no matter if you use plastic, metal or glass.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now