Amidst the backdrop of a weak quarterly earnings report that saw Intel lose money for the second quarter in a row, Intel today has announced that the company will be cutting costs by $10 billion in 2025 in an effort to bring Intel back to profitability. The cuts will touch almost every corner of the company in some fashion, with Intel planning to cut spending on R&D, marketing, administration, and capital expenditures. The most significant of these savings will come from a planned 15% reduction in force, which will see Intel lay off 15,000 employees over the next several months – thought to be one of Intel’s biggest layoffs ever.

In an email to Intel’s staff, which was simultaneously published to Intel’s website, company CEO Pat Gelsinger made the financial stakes clear: Intel is spending an unsustainable amount of money for their current revenues. Citing the company’s current costs, Gelsinger wrote that “our costs are too high, our margins are too low,“ and that “our annual revenue in 2020 was about $24 billion higher than it was last year, yet our current workforce is actually 10% larger now than it was then.” Consequently, Intel will be enacting a series of painful cuts to bring the company back to profitability.

Intel is not publicly disclosing precisely where those cuts will come from, but in the company’s quarterly earnings release, the company noted that it was targeting operating expenses, capital expenditures, and costs of sales alike.

For operating expenses, Intel will be cutting “non-GAAP R&D and marketing, general and administrative” spending, with a goal to trim that from $20 billion in 2024 to $17.5 billion in 2025. Meanwhile gross capital expenditures, a significant expense for Intel in recent years as the company has built up its fab network, are projected to drop from $25 billion to $27 billion for 2024, to somewhere between $20 billion and $23 billion in 2025. Compared to Intel’s previous plans for capital expenditures, this would reduce those costs by around 20%. And finally, the company is expecting to save $1 billion on the cost of sales in 2025.

Intel 2025 Spending Cuts
  2024 Projected Spending 2025 Projected Spending Projected Reduction
Operating Expenses
(R&D, Marketing, General, & Admin)
$20B $17.5B $2.5B
Capital Expenditures (Gross) $25B - $27B $20B - $23B $2B - $7B
Cost of Sales N/A $1B Savings $1B

Separately, in Intel’s email to its employees, Gelsinger outlined that these cuts will also require simplifying Intel’s product portfolio, as well as the company itself. The six key priorities for Intel will include cutting underperforming product lines, and cutting back Intel’s investment in new products to “fewer, more impactful projects”. Meanwhile on the administrative side of efforts, Intel is looking to eliminate redundancies and overlap there, as well as stopping non-essential work.

  • Reducing Operational Costs: We will drive companywide operational and cost efficiencies, including the cost savings and head count reductions mentioned above.
  • Simplifying Our Portfolio: We will complete actions this month to simplify our businesses. Each business unit is conducting a portfolio review and identifying underperforming products. We are also integrating key software assets into our business units so we accelerate our shift to systems-based solutions. And we will narrow our incubation focus on fewer, more impactful projects.
  • Eliminating Complexity: We will reduce layers, eliminate overlapping areas of responsibility, stop non-essential work, and foster a culture of greater ownership and accountability. For example, we will consolidate Customer Success into the Sales, Marketing and Communications Group to streamline our go-to-market motions.
  • Reducing Capital and Other Costs: With the completion of our historic five-nodes-in-four-years roadmap clearly in sight, we will review all active projects and equipment so we begin to shift our focus toward capital efficiency and more normalized spending levels. This will reduce our 2024 capital expenditures by more than 20%, and we plan to reduce our non-variable cost of goods sold by roughly $1 billion in 2025.
  • Suspending Our Dividend: We will suspend our stock dividend beginning next quarter to prioritize investments in the business and drive more sustained profitability.
  • Maintaining Growth Investments: Our IDM2.0 strategy is unchanged. Having fought hard to reestablish our innovation engine, we will maintain the key investments in our process technology and core product leadership.

The bulk of these cuts, in turn, will eventually come down to layoffs. As previously noted, Intel is planning to cut about 15% of its workforce. Just how many layoffs this will entail remains to be seen; Gelsinger’s letter puts it at roughly 15,000 employees, while Intel’s most recent published headcount would put this figure at closer to 17,000 employees.

Whatever the number, Intel is expecting to have most of the reductions completed by the end of this year. The company will be using a combination of early retirement packages and buy-outs, or what the company terms as “an application program for voluntary departures.”

Intel’s investors will be taking a hit, as well. The company’s generous quarterly dividend, a long-time staple of the chipmarker and one of the key tools to entice long-term investors, will be suspended starting in Q4 of 2024. With Intel losing money over multiple quarters, Intel cannot afford (or at least, cannot justify) paying out cash in the forms of dividends when that money could be getting invested in the company itself. Though as the long-term health of the company is still reliant on offering dividends, Intel says that the suspension will be temporary, as the company reiterated its “long-term commitment to a competitive dividend as cash flows improve to sustainably higher levels.” For Q2 2024, Intel paid out $0.125/share in dividends, or a total of roughly $0.5B.

Ultimately, the message coming from Intel today is that it is continuing (if not accelerating) its plans to slim down the company; to focus on a few areas of core competencies that suit the company’s abilities and its financial goals. Intel is throwing everything behind its IDM 2.0 initiative to regain process leadership and serve as a world-class contract foundry, and even with Intel’s planned spending cuts for 2025, that initiative will continue to move forward as planned.

On that note, cheering up investors in what’s otherwise a brutal report from the company, Intel revealed that they’ve achieved another set of key milestones with their in-development 18A process. The company released the 1.0 process design kit (PDK) to customers last month, and Intel has successfully powered-on their first Panther Lake and Clearwater Forest chips. 18A remains on track to be “manufacturing-ready” by the end of this year, with Intel looking to start wafer production in the first half of 2025. 18A remains a make-or-break technology for Intel Foundry, and the company as a whole, as this is the node that Intel expects to return them to process leadership – and from which they can improve upon to continue that leadership.

Sources: Intel Q2'24 Earnings, Intel Staff Letter

Comments Locked

68 Comments

View All Comments

  • sharath.naik - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    They had every opportunity to move to DEUV earlier than others, yet they just watched their balance sheet. Typical of all mangers with no background in tech. They will be back now that they are buying all the DEUV machines they can. But that will take until next year to come fully online for the quantity they need to make a difference to the bottom line. Their biggest risk is the gap they created until then, when customers will just move to AMD platforms and will be unwilling to move back. Because the platforms are already getting to the point of not needing replacement until it fails. What surprised me more that they have only $20Billion in cash equivalent, what happened to the near $20B in profit they were making for years!!
  • TheinsanegamerN - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    That was gross profit, not net, and most of it went into the manufacturing and R+D, plus servicing debt.
  • Blastdoor - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    “our annual revenue in 2020 was about $24 billion higher than it was last year“

    Ouch — that’s about one AMD worth of revenue. I guess about 20 percent of that is due to losing Apple and the rest is market share loss to AMD.

    They have to get some big foundry customers or they are dead.
  • Threska - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    AI is the big thing in a lot of books.
  • Kevin G - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    The fab side from a technology perspective has caught up but at great fiscal cost. Arguably fixing the fabs is what has gotten Intel into this situation they are in today. It can pay off if there are other customers to use these fabs. So who are they?

    Altera doesn't count since they were absorbed by Intel and then spun off again. They can migrate back to TSMC though chips in-flight in the design process are likely still married to Intel's fabs. Not worth the risk to change fab providers halfway.

    Cisco was a previous IDM 1.0 client though currently they are leveraging Intel for their silicon-photonics expertise to make high speed, lower power transceivers. It is unclear if Cisco is interested in using Intel for bulk logic for a switch ASIC again and/or some advanced packing.

    Intel needs a win from the likes of nVidia, Apple or even AMD to really make their fab investments worth while. The general presumption is that none of these companies are not willing to let the manufacturing wing of Intel see their designs in fear that it will leak to Intel's design teams which is a direct competitor.
  • flgt - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    Yeah, I could see them splitting out the Fab business eventually for this reason but it’s too weak right now. Also I think you’ll start seeing investors in TSMC pushing them to raise wafer prices since they don’t have competition and their customers are making obscene amounts of money. This could open the door a bit for Intel to at least present the threat of competition.
  • Blastdoor - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    “ The general presumption is that none of these companies are not willing to let the manufacturing wing of Intel see their designs in fear that it will leak to Intel's design teams which is a direct competitor.”

    That kinda makes sense for AMD, but I wonder if that’s really a legit worry for apple. Let’s imagine an apple design did leak to the design team at Intel. Intel would be suicidally insane to piss off apple (again). I can’t imagine intel acting on such information. The benefits would be trivial compared to the cost.

    I suspect the bigger issue with apple is that they would rather use the threat of intel to extract better terms from TSMC than actually using intel, especially given the history of the relationship.

    But I think Apple is foolish not to hedge their bets, especially given the geopolitical situation. If apple doesn’t fab AC/DC with Intel, I think they are making a mistake
  • Khanan - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    Design leaking is a nonsense fantasy - let’s say Intel copies a design, they would be sued to hell and back. AMD already won a suit against Intel when they were small, now they’d suit Intel to hell, Apple anyways.
  • ErikSwan - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    "The general presumption is that none of these companies are not willing to let the manufacturing wing of Intel see their designs in fear that it will leak to Intel's design teams which is a direct competitor."

    I don't know if I really buy this. Any semiconductor company can (and does) go buy products off the shelf and analyze them in their own labs to understand competitor's designs and technology. Or they can buy reverse engineering research reports from a company like TechInsights. Sure, using Intel as your foundry might let them see your designs a year or so before they reach the shelf, but there is not a lot of design knowledge to be gained anyway from the raw layout/geometry that the foundry gets without a significant amount of reverse engineering work.
  • name99 - Friday, August 2, 2024 - link

    What's the value for Apple in using Intel Fab?

    Apple made their priorities clear many years ago, repeatedly! LOWER POWER. That's the only priority that matters. Density and other process elements (like GAA or BSPD) are nice INSOFAR AS they further the goal of higher performance at lower power.

    And Intel made their priorities clear, repeatedly. GHZ. That's the only priority that matters. Meaning they rejected requests to build iPhone chips, then rejected requests to build lower power x86 chips.

    So here we are today. Intel is optimizing its fabs for GHz, even as the only thing Apple (and most of the rest of the world) cares about is power. Apple ain't gonna pay for the ability to run 6GHz M6's at 300W.

    nVidia details are different, but the big picture is much the same: nVidia wants density, not GHz. And both Apple and nVidia will stick with the company that's delivered year after year rather than risk catastrophe on the company that has failed to deliver year after year. Having to delay GAA or BSPD by a year won't change these fundamental facts.

    Delay of a decade, maybe, but delay of one year? Who cares? Both nV and Apple know that there's always another year; the only customers who switch away from you because of a one-year delay are the internet fantasy customers, continually complaining about this or that, continually claiming they're moving to Canada or Europe, continually threatening to switch to Linux or Windows, or to stop paying for Netflix, or to boycott Steam; experts in everything except actual, you know, reality...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now