Visual Inspection

The ASRock X570 Aqua is an E-ATX motherboard designed specifically for users intending to water cooling their system and stands as the most expensive X570 model in the current product stack at $999. What makes the X570 Aqua so unique is that its the only current X570 model to come with an integrated full-cover water block which is designed to cool the CPU, the power delivery, and the X570 chipset. Surrounding the water block and covering the PCB is an aluminium coated cover which hides the componentry on the lower portion of the board, including the audio PCB and PCIe slot area. Aligned with all the stylish silver aluminium design is some integrated RGB with ARGB LEDs in the block at the lower section where the X570 chipset is located. ASRock has missed a trick as the large acrylic window around the CPU socket has no ARGB and would look so much more elegant. There is also an ARGB LED strip integrated into the rear panel cover and users planning on using more LEDs can use the ARGB LED header and standard RGB LED header; only one of each is available. 

On / Off - click for full image

Looking at the PCIe support and the ASRock X570 Aqua has two full-length PCIe 4.0 slots which operate at x16, and x8/x8, with a third full-length PCIe 4.0 x4 slot located at the bottom; each full-length slot is coated in ASRock's Steel slot armor. What's interesting is that ASRock is using three PCIe 2.0 x1 slots instead of PCIe 4.0. While this isn't going to be an issue running devices like PCIe sound cards, it will have bandwidth implications when running additional storage devices or 2.5 GbE network cards. In the bottom right-hand corner of the board is a small overclockers toolkit with separate power and reset buttons, as well as a two-digit LED Debugger. The PCB on the ASRock X570 Aqua is E-ATX and uses a uniquely shaped PCB design for better access to the boards SATA ports.

Designed to be as compatible with the multiple brands of water cooling vendors, the fitting connectors on ASRock X570 Aqua are G1/4 which is the most commonly used and found fitting. As compatibility is good with other brands, the interior of the water block looks to be nickel-plated copper which should alleviate any issues with mixing metals within a loop, but it is recommended to check with the manufacturer before purchase. Typically, it is generally best to avoid mixing metal types when fitting a loop to reduce the risk of galvanic corrosion. The ASRock X570 Aqua has five 4-pin headers which are split into three sections; one for a CPU fan, one for a CPU fan/Water pump, and three for chassis fans. Given the nature of the Aqua, it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect a few more 4-pin headers for radiator fans, but users using more than a 240 mm radiator in the front will need to rely on fan splitters and fan hubs.

The out of the box memory support on the ASRock X570 Aqua is impressive with DDR4-5200 officially supported, despite the highest memory kit on the official QVL list rated for DDR4-4600. There are four memory slots with support for up to 128 GB, which means the 32 GB UDIMMs are supported on this model, like with other X570 models. The X570 Aqua does offer support for UDIMM ECC memory, but only when used with Ryzen Pro processors.

With the monoblock and the aluminium armor removed from the X570 Aqua, the monoblock itself is a large custom milled block of copper with channels connecting the CPU socket, power delivery, and X570 chipset parts. The block on the top-side is plated in aluminium to fit in with the design of the board, whereas the cooling elements of the block are made from nickel-plated copper which gives it the silvery sheen. The armor itself comes apart in three different sections; the monoblock, the PCIe cover, and the rear panel cover. The monoblock is attached to the board via screws at the rear with what looks and seems to be a consistent and equal amount of mounting pressure throughout. Due to the large nickel-plated copper monoblock and aluminium armor, the board weighs around 2.5 Kg (5 lbs) making this one of the heaviest motherboards we've ever seen. 

The power delivery on the ASRock X570 Aqua is using a 14-phase setup with an International Rectifier IR35201 6+2 PWM controller, with the CPU section reliant on doublers. The CPU section consists of twelve IR3555 60 A power stages which are paired up with six IR3599 doublers. Looking at the SoC section, the ASRock X570 Aqua is using two IR3555 60 A power stages which are the same used in the CPU section, but these aren't using doublers. Each power stage is complemented with an unmarked inductor. The ASRock X570 Aqua is using the same power delivery configuration and componentry as the ASRock X570 Creator, and the MSI MEG X570 Ace which we have previously reviewed. We know the cooling solution on the MSI MEG X570 Ace performs adequately and we expect the ASRock X570 Aqua with its custom monoblock which covers the CPU, power delivery, and X570 chipset, to perform much better in our thermal testing; this can be found later in the review.

Moving onto the onboard audio solution and the ASRock X570 Aqua is using a Realtek ALC1220 HD audio codec, with five gold Japanese audio capacitors. The front panel audio header is bolstered by a Texas Instruments NE5532 headphones amplifier with support for headphones up to 600 Ohms. The audio PCB is segregated from the rest of the PCB, but the Realtek ALC1220 codec doesn't include an EMI shield.

The ASRock X570 Aqua has two PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slots with the bottom slot featuring support for both PCIe 4.0 and SATA drives. Each slot includes its own integrated heatsink which is built into the PCIe panel of the aluminium coated armor. The top PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot supports drives up to M.2 221100, and the bottom PCIe 4.0 x4/SATA slot supports up to M.2 2280. Also present are eight SATA ports with four controlled from the X570 chipset with support for RAID 0, 1, and 10 arrays, and the other four controlled by a pair of ASMedia ASM1061 SATA controllers. The ASM1061 controller is a PCIe 2.0 controller which is odd on such a high-end model, but it does allow PCIe lanes to be allocated to other areas.

The reason ASRock is using PCIe 2.0 SATA controllers and PCIe 2.0 x1 slots instead of the newer counterparts is likely to accommodate the dual-port Intel JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 controller which requires four PCIe 3.0 lanes (which in this case takes up four PCIe 4.0 lanes without a PCIe switch). On the rear panel is two Thunderbolt 3 Type-C ports, along with a single DisplayPort 1.4 input, while a second DisplayPort 1.4 input is located just above the top PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot. This allows users to interconnect a discrete graphics card so that multiple 4K displays can be driven through the Thunderbolt 3 Type-C ports.

As well as the two Thunderbolt 3 Type-C ports, ASRock has also included six USB 3.1 G1 Type-A ports. The Realtek ALC1220 HD audio codec powers the five colour-coded 3.5 mm audio jacks and S/PDIF optical output, while users considering pairing up a $999 board with a Ryzen APU can use the single HDMI video output; the DisplayPort 1.4 port is an input for the Thunderbolt 3 controller as stated above. Wireless networking is handled by an Intel AX200 Wi-Fi 6 wireless interface, while the wired ports are controlled by an Aquantia AQC107 10 G and Intel I211-AT Gigabit Ethernet controller. A handily located BIOS Flashback button sits to the left-hand side of the rear panel, while a single PS/2 combo port allows users to go old school with a legacy keyboard or mouse. The rear panel itself includes a pre-attached rear IO shield and is white and silver in color which fits in with the rest of the board's design.

What's in the Box

Included inside the very premium X570 Aqua packaging is a wide variety of accessories to get users going out of the box. The most noteworthy accessories include spare thermal pads for the power delivery and chipset portions of the monoblock, a right-angled Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort cable, the Intel AX200 Wi-Fi 6 antenna, and four SATA cables. ASRock also includes a small tube of generic thermal paste. 

  • Quick Installation Guide
  • Driver and Software Installation Disc
  • ASRock Aqua Thank You Card
  • 4 x SATA cables
  • Right Angled Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable
  • Intel AX200 Wi-Fi 6 Antenna 
  • ASRock SLI HB Bridge
  • 2 x M.2 Standoffs/Screw kits
  • 2 x M.2 Heatsink Screws (spares)
  • 2 x CPU Socket Mounting Screws (spares)
  • 2 x Power Delivery/Chipset Mounting Screws (spares)
  • 8 x Spare Thermal Pads
  • 1 x Thermal Paste
ASRock X570 Aqua Overview BIOS And Software


View All Comments

  • Santoval - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    Your analogy is fallacious. You can't compare motherboards to Chanel handbags. They are motherboards ffs, not Hermes handbags. Reply
  • GreenReaper - Saturday, December 21, 2019 - link

    I do; I will. The test is whether people are willing to buy them on that basis, in part or in whole.
    The majority of people don't buy handbags that way either. But some do, and for many it's a factor.
  • YB1064 - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    The board is far from worthless. It performs on par with other high end boards, without the attendant heat. The feature set is also niche and premium. I think we are spoiled by the massive overclocks from Intel and thus anything offered by Ryzen seems paltry by comparison. I own a Supercarrrier Z270 and it runs a 7700k@5100MHz no problems. Great feature set and stable. ASRock is not trash by any means. Reply
  • DanNeely - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    As someone who watercools his systems I'm theoretically in the market for something like this. A mono-block appeals in that it avoids any potential issues with the VRMs being designed expecting airflow from a CPU cooler (my current haswell system has a board with a factory waterblock on the VRMs). But while I'd be willing to pay a premium over the cost of the mobo and CPU waterblock for it; they're marking up $500 for the waterblock and ~$400ish more than a CPU block is way too much of a premium even if I was willing to pay $500 for a baseline board with TB3 and 10GBE. $150 or maybe even $200 for the monoblock would be tempting. Reply
  • rahvin - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    As someone else that watercools I also had the same reaction. Interesting product, but it's not a serious product at it's price. It was created as a marketing effort which is why they are only making 1000 of them and more than half will probably go to review sites like anandtech. Reply
  • careyd - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    Pushback: I am building a workstation for DaVinci Resolve color grading on this board. 3950x, a pair of 2080Ti's, 64GB RAM. Requirement for me is 10Gbe and Thunderbolt 3 on board. My choice on X570 was down to the AsRock Creator $599 and Aqua ($999) due to this. They are essentially the same board, functionally speaking. I was committed to doing custom watercooling loop this time around...not because I had to but because I wanted to, but I'm happy to have the cooling improvements. So, if you are down to the choice of those two boards, and briefly consider building up the Creator with EK or equivalent quality waterblocks (if you can even find them for the chipset and VRMs on here), you'd be looking at about another ~$250-300 in costs over the cost of the Creator board. So in that situation a $200-ish premium for a well-integrated custom monoblock board is not that big of a stretch.

    To be clear, I'm not saying it's for everybody, but for a system that will generate revenue 20x it's cost in it's usable lifetime I think it's fine.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    If you only generate $50-100K in revenue from your build over its lifespan (assuming 2 years here) then you need to go find a better source of income because that is some low end chump change for all that effort. Reply
  • careyd - Saturday, December 21, 2019 - link

    I dont feed trolls. You'll have to get your satisfaction elsewhere. Reply
  • PeachNCream - Monday, December 23, 2019 - link

    There's nothing about pointing out that the ROI you quoted is barely scraping out middle income on the high end if your estimates of revenue over costs are accurate that constitutes trolling. However, I do know of people that get offended when the facts of their statements turn out to look a bit silly and then accuse others of trolling in order to feel better. Reply
  • lmcd - Tuesday, June 16, 2020 - link

    You're clearly trolling if you can't calculate the cost of that build. $1700 for CPU + Mobo, another 2k for GPUs, over $300 in RAM, $100 for the water cooler, $150 for the case, $150 for the PSU, and assuredly $300 or more of storage. That's a minimum of $4800 without whatever pro monitor he might be including and whatever combination of better cooling, storage, or case he's including.

    That's already at your "maximum" estimate for revenue, and that's the minimum reasonable for the build.

    Then there's the next fallacy: you're assuming there's not a PC this is replacing, which is an absolutely idiotic assumption. ROI is always against the status quo, not against 0. An "aging" machine with a i7-6950X and 2x GTX 1080 would greatly decrease the expected ROI, so you can't project his revenue against the cost of the machine and the ROI ratio.

    So yes you're absolutely trolling. Just because you're a regular doesn't mean your head isn't up somewhere it shouldn't be.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now